The Archbishop of Canterbury has used his Christmas sermon to question whether the richest people are bearing their share of the economic downturn.
He might lead by example, but it's difficult to tell; anyone who has the rent-free use of a luxury riverside palace (Lambeth Palace) and draws a salary of almost £70k should think twice before exhorting "the rich" to share the pain unless he's absolutely certain that his own house is in order.
It'll be interesting to see if charity really does begin at home or whether, when he talks of the rich he just means other people.
And just to be clear, I don't actually care how much he earns or where he lives (I assume he pays tax on his benefits, like Lambeth Palace - that would be fair, wouldn't it?). As the CEO of a major corporation with substantial assets he is almost certainly underpaid when compared with the leaders of other large companies but at least his peers don't lecture everyone about fellowship and loyalty. Is Dr Williams bearing his share of the economic downturn?